GST refund rejection — common reasons and fixes
Most GST refund rejections trace back to a handful of recurring issues — documentation mismatches, ITC not matching GSTR-2B, an incorrectly selected refund category, or a claim filed outside the two-year window. When an officer identifies a deficiency rather than outright rejecting the claim, they issue a deficiency memo (RFD-03), which requires a fresh RFD-01 filing correcting the identified gap.
Deficiency memo (RFD-03) vs outright rejection
A deficiency memo under RFD-03 is not the same as a rejection — it's issued when the officer finds the application incomplete or inconsistent and needs the taxpayer to correct and re-file. An outright rejection, communicated through an order in RFD-06, follows a full review where the officer has concluded the claim (or part of it) isn't admissible, and it carries appeal rights.
Documentation and data mismatches
The most common reason for a deficiency memo is a mismatch between what's declared in the refund application and what's reflected in the taxpayer's own GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, or GSTR-2B for the same period — for instance, export invoice values not matching what was reported in GSTR-1, or ITC claimed in the refund exceeding what's available in GSTR-2B.
Wrong refund category or formula errors
Selecting the wrong refund category (for example, filing an inverted duty structure claim under the general "any other" category) or errors in applying the prescribed refund formula are also frequent causes — these usually surface as a query or deficiency memo asking for clarification or a corrected computation.
Shunya's CA team handles GST refund filing end to end — eligibility check, RFD-01 filing, and follow-up until credited.
Talk to a CA →Time-barred claims
A claim filed after the two-year window from the relevant date is generally rejected outright rather than returned as a deficiency, since there is no cure for a time-barred application under the standard process. This underscores the importance of tracking relevant dates well ahead of filing.
How to respond and fix a deficiency
On receiving an RFD-03, the taxpayer needs to file a fresh RFD-01 addressing the specific gap identified — the earlier application is treated as withdrawn, so any correct portions need to be re-submitted along with the fix, not just the corrected element in isolation. It's worth reading the memo carefully (or having a CA review it) since responding to only part of the deficiency often results in a second round of queries.
Appealing an outright rejection
If a claim is formally rejected via RFD-06, the taxpayer has the right to appeal to the appellate authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act, within the prescribed appeal timeline. Refunds sanctioned through a favourable appellate order carry a higher rate of interest for the delay period than a standard delayed refund, reflecting the additional time the dispute has taken.
Can I re-file after getting an RFD-03 deficiency memo?
Yes — an RFD-03 deficiency memo requires filing a fresh RFD-01 application that corrects the specific gap identified by the officer. The original application is treated as closed once the memo is issued, so the new filing needs to include the full claim again, not just the corrected portion. There's no separate 'resubmission' form — it's a complete new application referencing the same period and category.
This article is for general information only. For your specific situation, consult a practicing CA.
Get your refund, the easy way
Shunya's CA team handles GST refund filing end to end — eligibility check, RFD-01 filing, and follow-up until credited.
Get Started →